Technology·News & analysis
GM to pay $220 million over selling drivers' data
General Motors settled with 36 states over claims it sold driving and location data to data brokers. It must now get drivers' consent first.

Tide
Wave
Sci-fi
3/10
Reality
Shipping
Your car quietly keeps a diary, and now it needs permission.How we rate
General Motors will pay $220 million to 36 states to settle claims it sold drivers' private driving and location data to data brokers, who passed it to insurers.
GM must now get express consent before collecting or sharing that data, and a third party will check its privacy program. The deal follows an FTC order and a California settlement. GM says it ended the Smart Driver product in 2024.
What to know
- General Motors will pay $220 million to settle a lawsuit from attorneys general in 36 states over selling drivers' driving and location data to data brokers.
- GM must get drivers' express consent before it collects or shares driving and location data, and a third party must check that GM follows its privacy program.
- The data came from Smart Driver, a free feature in GM's connected car apps that GM ended in 2024.
- The deal follows an FTC order finalized in January and a $12.75 million California settlement announced in May.
TechCrunch reports that General Motors will pay $220 million to 36 states to settle claims that it illegally sold drivers' private data. The question is how a free app feature in your car ended up in a courtroom.
What was announced?
The agreement was announced on Thursday. It settles a lawsuit brought by a coalition of attorneys general from 36 states, TechCrunch reports. Ars Technica describes the group as the District of Columbia plus 35 states.
An attorney general is a state's top lawyer. The states alleged that GM sold private driving behavior and location information to data brokers. Data brokers are companies that buy and resell personal information. They in turn sold it to insurance providers.
In real life Think of a driving diary that lists where you went and how hard you braked. The claim is that copies of it ended up with companies that set insurance prices.
What is Smart Driver?
Smart Driver was a free feature inside GM's connected car apps. It tracked and rated driving habits and seat belt use. Ars Technica says GM marketed it as a way for parents to watch teen drivers or for adults to track their own driving.
The data was gathered through GM and its OnStar service. OnStar is GM's 30-year-old safety and roadside assistance service.
GM says the agreement "addresses Smart Driver, a product we ended in 2024." It also says the deal "reinforces steps we've taken to strengthen our privacy practices."
How did this come to light?
It began with a New York Times report more than two years ago. TechCrunch says the report showed how GM and OnStar collected, used and sold drivers' precise location data and driving behavior to third parties.
Those third parties included the data brokers LexisNexis and Verisk. The brokers sold the information to insurance companies, which could affect customers' rates, according to the Times as summarized by TechCrunch.
Ars Technica adds that some drivers found their insurance became more expensive. It also says many of them claimed they never knew they had agreed to share such data.
What must GM do now?
The terms are in line with deals GM already reached with California and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), TechCrunch says. The FTC is the US agency that polices unfair business practices.
- Express consent: GM must get drivers' clear, explicit permission before it collects or shares their driving and location data.
- Third-party check: an outside party must assess whether GM follows the privacy program it has set up.
- No linked sales: GM says it will no longer sell vehicle data that can be linked to a person, a vehicle's location or how someone drives.
The catch: TechCrunch notes GM may still disclose anonymized data, meaning data not tied to one person, with certain partners.
GM has also updated its privacy policy and created a consumer-facing Privacy Center, a page where customers can see and manage their choices.
The outside review is the new part. TechCrunch says earlier agreements did not include it.
What happened before this deal?
This is the third big public step in the story. Here is the timeline from the sources we read:
- 2024: GM ends Smart Driver, according to GM's statement and Ars Technica.
- January 2025: GM and OnStar agree to an FTC settlement, Insurance Journal reports.
- January 2026: the FTC finalizes its order. It bans sharing geolocation or driver behavior data with consumer reporting agencies for five years.
- May 2026: CalMatters reports GM agreed to pay $12.75 million in civil penalties to California, the largest ever under the California Consumer Privacy Act. California officials said GM made about $20 million from selling data between 2020 and 2024.
- October 29, 2026: the $220 million multistate deal.
What did California find?
California settled first, and its case gives the most detail. Insurance Journal, running Reuters reporting, says GM agreed in May to pay $12.75 million to resolve an investigation by California Attorney General Rob Bonta. The deal was subject to court approval.
The state said GM sold two data brokers detailed driving data on hundreds of thousands of Californians. The data included names, phone numbers and home addresses. It also showed the GPS location of where OnStar subscribers drove and parked.
- Driving habits: from 2016 through 2024 GM also tracked speeds and sudden acceleration, the state said.
- The money: California said GM reportedly made about $20 million nationwide from these data sales.
- The ban: the deal bars GM from selling that data to brokers and includes a five-year ban on sales of personal data.
The catch: Bonta said California drivers did not see rate hikes from GM's data sales. State insurance law bars insurers there from using driving data to set rates. Media reports said insurers elsewhere used such data to raise prices.
Bonta also said GM sold the data "despite numerous statements reassuring drivers that it would not do so." That is the state's allegation, and GM said its deal addresses Smart Driver and strengthens its privacy practices.
What did the FTC say?
The FTC is the federal watchdog in this story. Insurance Journal reports the agency said GM's behavior was an "egregious betrayal of consumers' trust."
In January 2025 the FTC said GM and OnStar agreed not to disclose or sell sensitive geolocation and driver behavior data to consumer reporting agencies for five years. A consumer reporting agency is a company that compiles records used to judge people, such as for credit or insurance.
The final order came in January 2026. Repairer Driven News says it lasts 20 years. For that whole time, GM must:
- Ask first: get clear consent before collecting, using or sharing connected vehicle data, with exceptions such as sending location to emergency responders.
- Show and delete: let US consumers request a copy of their data and ask for deletion.
- Switch off location: let drivers turn off precise location collection where the vehicle can do it.
- Opt out: offer a way to opt out of location and driver behavior collection, with limited exceptions.
Are other states still suing?
Possibly. Earlier this year, Repairer Driven News reported that Iowa's attorney general had filed its own lawsuit. It claimed GM collected and sold data from 186,000 Iowa vehicles.
The same outlet said attorneys general in Arkansas, Nebraska and Texas had also sued GM. A Florida consumer had sued too. The articles we read do not say how those cases stand after this settlement.
These were claims in lawsuits. They are not findings by a court.
Why does this matter beyond GM?
Cars now carry cameras, sensors and powerful computers. TechCrunch says automakers are betting big on software-centered vehicles that connect to your calendar, messages and email.
GM itself is adding a personal AI assistant to OnStar. TechCrunch reports that cameras on the vehicle will connect to the software to offer live views and crash and safety recordings. You will also be able to use your voice to control things like the climate settings.
GM said at its GM Forward event in October that customers decide what data is shared. It said recordings have time limits and are encrypted, and that neither GM nor OnStar can access Connected Camera recordings.
Customers who choose not to share data will likely get fewer features, GM says.
What it means for you
- Expect a clear question: GM must ask for your express consent before collecting or sharing driving and location data.
- Check your settings: look for GM's Privacy Center and review what your car's apps are allowed to collect.
- Know the trade-off: GM says opting out of sharing will likely limit some features.
- Watch for the review: the outside check is meant to confirm GM follows its own rules.
The bottom line
GM will pay $220 million and change how it handles drivers' data. The core rule is simple: ask first, and keep the data that points to a person out of the broker market.
As cars gain cameras and AI helpers, that rule will matter more. The next test is whether the outside review shows it working.
Key facts
- Amount
- $220 million
- Who sued
- Attorneys general of 36 states
- Product at issue
- Smart Driver, ended in 2024
- New requirement
- Third-party review of GM's privacy program
Got questions?
Quick answers, plain wordsHow much is GM paying?
General Motors will pay $220 million to 36 states, according to TechCrunch. The agreement was announced on Thursday, October 29, 2026.
What did GM do that led to this lawsuit?
The states alleged that GM sold private driving behavior and location information to data brokers. The brokers then sold it on to insurance companies, TechCrunch reports.
What is Smart Driver?
It was a free feature in GM's connected car apps that tracked and rated driving behavior and seat belt use. GM ended it in 2024.
What is a data broker?
A data broker is a company that collects information about people and sells it to other businesses. In this case the brokers named by the New York Times were LexisNexis and Verisk.
Does GM still sell my driving data?
GM says it will no longer sell vehicle information that can be linked to a person, a vehicle's location or how someone drives. TechCrunch notes GM may still share anonymized data that isn't tied to an individual with certain partners.
Do I have to agree before GM collects my data now?
Yes. The settlement requires GM to get drivers' express consent before it collects or shares their driving and location data, matching earlier deals with California and the FTC.
What is new in this settlement?
TechCrunch says the new piece is a requirement that a third party assess GM's compliance with the privacy program it has put in place.
Did GM admit anything?
The sources we read don't say. In its statement GM said the agreement addresses Smart Driver, a product it ended in 2024, and reinforces steps it has taken to strengthen its privacy practices.
Will drivers get money?
The reports we read say GM pays the $220 million to the states. They don't say whether individual drivers will receive payments.
SourcesTechCrunch
Topics and tagsgeneral motors, onstar, privacy, data brokers
Related stories

Discord will let Google show messages from its biggest public servers
From mid-December, some messages in Discord's large public servers may appear in web search results. Admins and members can opt out, and the setting is off by default in several regions.

MapQuest's new Surveillance Layer shows where license plate readers are
A free toggle in the MapQuest app puts known license plate readers and outdoor cameras from Flock Safety and a dozen other brands on the map.

UK Legal Aid Agency hackers took records going back to 1978
Eighteen months after the attack, the Ministry of Justice says about 250,000 stolen Legal Aid Agency records predate 2007, and some probation data was taken too.
More in brief
- Intel stock falls about 28% after a weak PC outlook and rising memory pricesOct 30
- Fujifilm will boost magnetic tape output 5x as AI piles up dataOct 30
- A humanist wins a religious exemption from using AI at workOct 30
- Binance loses about $6.3 billion in the biggest crypto theft on recordOct 30
- Reddit is moving to logged-in only as AI eats its search trafficOct 30
- GMO Internet says hackers posted data stolen from its Onamae cloud desktopsOct 28